SCIO: Revista de Filosofía


Neuroderecho y la Neurociencia del libre albedrío: una visión general


Debido al advenimiento de la neurociencia moderna, várias disciplinas científicas han desarrollado teorías, perspectivas y metodologías completamente nuevas. Los sustanciales avances y descubrimientos realizados en este campo durante las últimas décadas, especialmente los relacionados con la cognición y el comportamiento humanos, han marcado el rumbo de muchas áreas de investigación tradicionales y han dado lugar a otras, como la neuroética y el neuroderecho. Aquí echamos un vistazo a algunas de las características generales del creciente campo del neuroderecho, un campo interdisciplinario que se concentra en la intersección del derecho y la neurociencia. Luego discutimos la neurociencia del libre albedrío, uno de los temas más impactantes y urgentes en el debate del neuroderecho, con especial atención al paradigma de Libet, los desarrollos científicos recientes y las interpretaciones novedosas que cuestionan los supuestos habituales al respecto.


Alces, P. The Moral Conflict of Law and Neuroscience. (2018). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

Bard, I., Gaskell, G., Allansdottir, A., da Cunha, R. V., Eduard, P., Hampel, J., ... & Zwart, H. (2018). Bottom up ethics-neuroenhancement in education and employment. Neuroethics, 11(3), 309-322.

Belcher, A., & Sinnott?Armstrong, W. (2010). Neurolaw. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(1), 18-22.

Bennett, M. R. & Hacker, P. M. S. (2003). Philosophical foundations of neuroscience (Vol. 79). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Bennett, M. R., Dennett, D., Hacker, P., & Searle, J. (2007). Neuroscience and philosophy: Brain, mind, and language. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Blackmore, S., Clark, T. W., Hallett, M., Haynes, J. D., Honderich, T., Levy, N., ... & Waller, B. (2013). Exploring the illusion of free will and moral responsibility. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books

Brass, M., Furstenberg, A., & Mele, A. R. (2019). Why neuroscience does not disprove free will. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 102, 251-263.

Brass, M., Lynn, M. T., Demanet, J., & Rigoni, D. (2013). Imaging volition: what the brain can tell us about the will. Experimental brain research, 229(3), 301-312.

Bunge, M. (2014). The mind–body problem: A psychobiological approach. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press Inc.

Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2005). Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(1), 9-64.

Catley, P. (2016). The Future of Neurolaw. European Journal of Current Legal Issues, 22(2).

Chandler, J. A. (2018). Neurolaw and neuroethics. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 27(4), 590-598.

Churchland, P. S. (1989). Neurophilosophy: Toward a unified science of the mind-brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Clausen, J., & Levy, N. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of neuroethics. Heidelberg: Springer Netherlands.

Crick, F., & Clark, J. (1994). The astonishing hypothesis. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 1(1), 10-16.

Darby, R. R., Joutsa, J., Burke, M. J., & Fox, M. D. (2018). Lesion network localization of free will. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(42), 10792-10797.

Decety, J., & Wheatley, T. (Eds.). (2015). The moral brain: A multidisciplinary perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Dennett, D. C. (1993). Consciousness explained. London: Penguin UK.

Dominik, T., Dostál, D., Zielina, M., Šmahaj, J., Sedlá?ková, Z., & Procházka, R. (2017). Libet’s experiment: Questioning the validity of measuring the urge to move. Consciousness and cognition, 49, 255-263.

Fernandez-Duque, D., Evans, J., Christian, C., Hodges, S. Superfluous Neuroscience Information Makes Explanations of Psychological Phenomena More Appealing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (2015) 27:5, 926-944

Fischer, J. M., Kane, R., Pereboom, D., & Vargas, M. (2009). Four views on free will. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

Focquaert, F., Caruso, G., Shaw, E., & Pereboom, D. (2020). Justice without retribution: interdisciplinary perspectives, stakeholder views and practical implications. Neuroethics, 13(1), 1-3.

Forstmann, M., & Burgmer, P. (2018). A free will needs a free mind: Belief in substance dualism and reductive physicalism differentially predict belief in free will and determinism. Consciousness and cognition, 63, 280-293.

Frede, M. (2011). A free will: Origins of the notion in ancient thought. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.

Fried, I., Mukamel, R., & Kreiman, G. (2011). Internally generated preactivation of single neurons in human medial frontal cortex predicts volition. Neuron, 69(3), 548-562.

Frith, C. D., & Haggard, P. (2018). Volition and the brain–revisiting a classic experimental study. Trends in neurosciences, 41(7), 405-407.

Fumagalli, M., & Priori, A. (2012). Functional and clinical neuroanatomy of morality. Brain, 135(7), 2006-2021.

Galton, F. (1891). Hereditary genius. New York, NY: D. Appleton.

García-López, E., Mercurio, E., Nijdam-Jones, A., Morales, L. A., & Rosenfeld, B. (2019). Neurolaw in Latin America: Current status and challenges. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 18(3), 260-280.

Genschow, O., Hawickhorst, H., Rigoni, D., Aschermann, E., & Brass, M. (2020). Professional Judges’ Disbelief in Free Will Does Not Decrease Punishment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1948550620915055;

Genschow, O., Rigoni, D., & Brass, M. (2017). Belief in free will affects causal attributions when judging others' behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(38), 10071–10076. doi:10.1073/pnas.1701916114

Greene, J., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). For the Law, Neuroscience Changes Nothing and Everything. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences.

Haggard, P., & Eimer, M. (1999). On the relation between brain potentials and the awareness of voluntary movements. Experimental brain research, 126(1), 128-133.

Hirstein, W., Sifferd, K. L., & Fagan, T. K. (2018). Responsible Brains: Neuroscience, Law, and Human Culpability. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Illes, J., & Sahakian, B. J. (Eds.). (2013). Oxford handbook of neuroethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jones, O. D., Marois, R., Farah, M. J., & Greely, H. T. (2013). Law and neuroscience. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(45), 17624-17630.

Jones, O. D., Schall, J. D., & Shen, F. X. (2015). Law and neuroscience. New York, NY: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.

Kolber, A. Will There Be a Neurolaw Revolution? Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 89, p. 807, 2014

Kornhuber, H. H., & Deecke, L. (1964, January). Hirnpotentialanderungen beim Menschen vor und nach Willkurbewegungen dargestellt mit Magnetbandspeicherung und Ruckwartsanalyse. In Pflugers Archiv-European Journal of Physiology (Vol. 281, No. 1, p. 52).

Lee, N., Broderick, A. J., & Chamberlain, L. (2007). What is ‘neuromarketing’? A discussion and agenda for future research. International journal of psychophysiology, 63(2), 199-204.

Levy, N. (2014). Is neurolaw conceptually confused? The journal of ethics, 18(2), 171-185.

Libet, B. (1985). Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action. Behavioral and brain sciences, 8(4), 529-539.

Libet, B., Gleason, C. A., Wright, E. W., & Pearl, D. K. (1993). Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). Neurophysiology of consciousness (pp. 249-268). Boston, MA: Birkhäuser

Lilienfeld, S. O., Aslinger, E., Marshall, J., & Satel, S. (2018). Neurohype: A field guide to exaggerated brain-based claims. In L. S. M. Johnson & K. S. Rommelfanger (Eds.), Routledge handbooks in applied ethics. The Routledge handbook of neuroethics (p. 241–261). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Lombroso, C. (1880). L'uomo delinquente (Vol. 85). Torino: Fratelli Bocca.

Maoz, U., & Yaffe, G. (2016). What does recent neuroscience tell us about criminal responsibility?. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 3(1), 120-139.

Meynen, G. (2014). Neurolaw: neuroscience, ethics, and law. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 17(4), 819-829.

Moniz, E. (1937). Prefrontal leucotomy in the treatment of mental disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 93(6), 1379-1385.

Moore, M. S. (2020). Mechanical Choices: The Responsibility of the Human Machine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Morse, S. (2004, January). New neuroscience, old problems: legal implications of brain science. In Cerebrum: the Dana forum on brain science (Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 81-90).

Morse, S. (2011). Avoiding irrational neurolaw exuberance: a plea for neuromodesty. Law, Innovation and Technology, 3(2), 209-228.

Muñoz, J.M. (2012). Hacia una sistematización de la relación entre determinismo y libertad. Daimon Revista Internacional de Filosofia, (56), 5-19.

Muñoz, J.M. (2013). Neurofilosofía y libre albedrío. Daimon: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 59: 57-70.

Muñoz, J. M., García-López, E., & Rusconi, E. (2020). Neurolaw: The Call for Adjusting Theory Based on Scientific Results. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2479.

Nann, M., Cohen, L. G., Deecke, L., & Soekadar, S. R. (2019). To jump or not to jump-The Bereitschaftspotential required to jump into 192-meter abyss. Scientific reports, 9(1), 1-9.

Pardo, M. S., & Patterson, D. (2015). Minds, brains, and law: The conceptual foundations of law and neuroscience. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Picozza, N. Neurolaw: An introduction. (2016) New York, NY: Springer

Poldrack, R. A. (2018). The new mind readers: What neuroimaging can and cannot reveal about our thoughts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Rigoni, D., Kühn, S., Sartori, G., & Brass, M. (2011). Inducing disbelief in free will alters brain correlates of preconscious motor preparation: The brain minds whether we believe in free will or not. Psychological science, 22(5), 613-618.

Roskies, A. (2002). Neuroethics for the new millenium. Neuron, 35(1), 21-23.

Roskies, A. L. (2011). Why Libet’s studies don’t pose a threat to free will. Conscious will and responsibility, 11-22.

Ryle, G. (2009). The concept of mind. London, UK: Hutchinson & Co

Schleim, S., Spranger, T. M., Erk, S., & Walter, H. (2011). From moral to legal judgment: the influence of normative context in lawyers and other academics. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 6(1), 48-57.

Schreiber, D. (2017). Neuropolitics: Twenty years later. Politics and the Life Sciences, 36(2), 114-131.

Schurger, A., Sitt, J. D., & Dehaene, S. (2012). An accumulator model for spontaneous neural activity prior to self-initiated movement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(42), E2904-E2913.

Shariff, A. F., Greene, J. D., Karremans, J. C., Luguri, J. B., Clark, C. J., Schooler, J. W., ... & Vohs, K. D. (2014). Free will and punishment: A mechanistic view of human nature reduces retribution. Psychological science, 25(8), 1563-1570.

Shen, F. X. (2010). The law and neuroscience bibliography: Navigating the emerging field of neurolaw. International Journal of Legal Information, 38(3), 352-399.

Shen, F. X. (2016). Law and neuroscience 2.0. Ariz. St. LJ, 48, 1043.

Shen, F. X. (2016). The overlooked history of neurolaw. Fordham L. Rev., 85, 667.

Sinnott-Armstrong, W., & Nadel, L. (Eds.). (2010). Conscious will and responsibility: A tribute to Benjamin Libet. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Soon, C. S., Brass, M., Heinze, H. J., & Haynes, J. D. (2008). Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain. Nature neuroscience, 11(5), 543-545.

Taylor, J. S; J. Anderson Harp; Tyron Elliott (1991). Neuropsychologists and Neurolawyers. Neuropsychology. 5 (4): 293–305

Verplaetse, J. (2009). Localizing the moral sense: Neuroscience and the search for the cerebral seat of morality, 1800-1930. Dordrecht: Springer.

Wagner, A. D., Bonnie, R. J., Casey, B. J., Davis, A., Faigman, D. L., Hoffman, M. B., ... & Yaffe, G. (2016). fMRI and lie detection. Vanderbilt Law Research Paper No. 17-10

Wegner, D. M. (2003). The mind's best trick: how we experience conscious will. Trends in cognitive sciences, 7(2), 65-69.

Wisniewski, D., Deutschländer, R., & Haynes, J. D. (2019). Free will beliefs are better predicted by dualism than determinism beliefs across different cultures. PloS one, 14(9), e0221617.

Yang, Q., Shao, R., Zhang, Q., Li, C., Li, Y., Li, H., & Lee, T. (2019). When morality opposes the law: an fMRI investigation into punishment judgments for crimes with good intentions. Neuropsychologia, 127, 195


Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.